Skip to main content

Professional Services · Training + Fine-tuning

Training that lands on a working checkpoint

LoRA fine-tunes through large-scale GPU pre-training runs. Distributed training engineering across PyTorch FSDP, DeepSpeed, NeMo, Megatron, TRL, Axolotl. Data prepared properly, recipes picked deliberately, runs that recover from node loss without restarting from zero. Reproducible from git SHA + seed.

Frameworks we drive
Full pre-train · SFT · DPO / RLHFH100 · H200 · B200 · B300Reproducible by default

Representative run

Stable

Llama-3 8B · SFT on customer data · 64×H100

Eval loss

step 0 → 50

Final loss

0.62

MFU

48%

Throughput

6.4k tok/s

No diverged steps. Checkpoints every 500 steps to parallel FS. Run-record fully reproducible from git SHA + seed.

The stages of work

From dataset to signed-off checkpoint

Every training engagement runs through the same stages. The ratio shifts with the recipe; the discipline doesn't.

Data preparation

Dataset assembly, deduplication, tokenisation, train/val split, contamination check. The unglamorous step that most regressions trace back to.

Exit

Dataset card · tokenised shards · contamination report

Recipe selection

LoRA vs full fine-tune vs continued pre-training vs alignment. Picked against your data volume, compute budget, and eval target.

Exit

Recipe doc · ablation plan · accuracy/cost projection

Training engineering

Parallelism strategy (DP / FSDP / TP / PP), optimiser config, learning-rate schedule, checkpoint cadence. Cluster tuned for MFU not for marketing numbers.

Exit

Run scripts · cluster topology · MFU report

Run + recovery

Live monitoring, divergence handling, hardware-failure recovery, smart restarts. Long pre-training runs that recover from a node failure without restarting from zero.

Exit

Telemetry dashboards · incident playbook · recovery runbook

Eval + sign-off

Evaluation against your held-out set + standard public benches. Accuracy delta vs baseline, regression checks, signed decision record.

Exit

Eval report · model card · sign-off record

Where training runs go wrong

The failures we've already debugged for you

Long runs are a different discipline from notebook experiments. These are the failure shapes that wreck schedules.

Loss spike at step 30k

Naïve response

Restart from scratch

What we ship

Skip-step recovery + LR rewind

Long pre-training runs hit instabilities. The right response is not a restart; it is rewinding the optimiser state, lowering the LR, skipping the offending batch range, and continuing. We script this so on-call handles it without paging the model team.

Gradient norm exploding

Naïve response

Cap and pray

What we ship

Activation checkpointing + gradient-norm telemetry

When grad-norm climbs it tells you something. Capping it hides the symptom; reading it tells you whether to drop LR, scale FSDP, or fix a tokeniser bug.

MFU stuck below 40%

Naïve response

Buy more GPUs

What we ship

Parallelism re-tile + comms overlap

Most fleets sit at sub-40% MFU because nobody ever re-tiled the parallelism for the model + cluster they have. Right tile, comms overlap, and activation recompute knobs typically lift MFU into the 50-60% band without buying anything.

Eval regression on held-out

Naïve response

Ship anyway, fix in v2

What we ship

Run-bisect against eval suite

When a fine-tuned model regresses on the customer eval, the answer is not to ship anyway. We bisect the training run against the eval suite to isolate which data segment or optimiser step introduced the regression.

Frameworks we drive

We pick the framework that fits the recipe

No religion. The right framework is the one that gets your checkpoint to your eval set fastest, with reproducibility on the way.

PyTorch FSDP / DeepSpeed

Default for full fine-tunes and most pre-training runs. Mature ecosystem.

NVIDIA NeMo + Megatron

Megatron-LM core for large parallelism setups. NeMo for the framework around it.

Hugging Face TRL + Accelerate

SFT + alignment (DPO, KTO, PPO) with the smallest amount of glue code.

Axolotl + Unsloth

LoRA / QLoRA + sane defaults for small / mid teams. Fast onramp.

JAX / Flax (on GPU or TPU)

JIT-compiled training when you need the throughput edge and the team's JAX-comfortable.

Custom in-house

We work inside your existing training framework when there is one and it makes sense.

Your handover pack

What lands at sign-off

Concrete, version-controlled artefacts that make the run investable, not a one-shot. Your team can pick up the next training cycle without us.

Dataset + tokeniser package

Tokenised shards, dataset card, contamination report. The training data your model actually saw, with a paper trail.

Training as-code repo

Run scripts, parallelism config, optimiser + LR schedule, checkpoint policy. Reproducible from a git SHA + seed.

Run-record + telemetry pack

Full run history, loss curves, MFU, grad-norm, throughput. Importable into your existing W&B / MLflow / Aim.

Incident + recovery playbook

What on-call does when a node dies, loss spikes, or eval regresses. Tested on the day, not invented during the next incident.

Final checkpoint + model card

The signed-off model with its evaluation results, intended use, known limitations, and the licence position.

Continuation plan

What changes if you want to re-run on more data, alignment-tune, or swap base model. So the work is investable, not one-shot.

How we engage

Pick the shape that fits your team

Yobitel-led

We own the training stack end-to-end

Data prep through final-checkpoint sign-off, plus optional managed-ops handover for the running fleet. Best for teams without a dedicated training-engineering function.

Collaborative

We engineer with your team

Paired work on the tricky surfaces: parallelism tile, optimiser tuning, eval design, divergence recovery. Your team owns the run; we sign off on the design and join the long-watch.

Advisory

Time-boxed review

Fixed-window engagement to review a training plan you've already drafted. We spot risk, suggest focused changes, deliver a written report.

Tell us what you want trained.

A short questionnaire covers workload, scale, and engagement model. Our training practice lead replies inside one working day with a fitted recipe, a parallelism plan, and a checkpoint timeline.

Prefer email? Contact us

Same engineering bench that designs the fabric, the platform, and the inference cluster around the model. Engagements scoped to any sovereignty perimeter. Optional 24/7 day-2 handover. Reproducible from git SHA + seed.