Skip to main content

Professional Services · Platform Layer

Total-estate platform delivery for AI GPU clouds

OS provisioning to day-2 operations across bare metal, VMs, and containers. We deploy whichever toolchain fits your business model: MaaS, Foreman, BCM, Dell Omnia for provisioning; Ansible, AWX, Ansible Automation Platform, Rundeck for automation; Kubespray, Rancher, OpenShift, or custom CNCF for Kubernetes; KubeVirt, KVM, Proxmox, OpenStack for virtualisation. Vendor-agnostic by design.

See the reference stacks
Bare metal · VMs · ContainersVendor-agnostic toolchainGitOps + as-code by defaultOptional day-2 managed-ops handover

Reference stacks

Three form factors, one delivery practice

Workloads land on bare metal, VMs, or containers (or a hybrid of all three). Each mode has its own reference stacks; we deploy the one that fits your team and your procurement.

Kubernetes-native. NVIDIA GPU Operator, batch-aware scheduling, namespace-level multi-tenancy.

Default choice

Kubespray + custom CNCF

Vanilla upstream. CNCF stack tailored to your ops profile.

KubesprayGPU OperatorNetwork OperatorKueuePrometheusLoki

What you get

  • Maximum portability, no vendor lock-in
  • Components picked against your ops profile
  • Same K8s you can grow with

Best fit · Cloud-native engineering teams · CNCF-fluent ops

Alternatives · we deploy whichever fits

Rancher (SUSE)

Multi-cluster K8s with a UI on top.

RancherRKE2LonghornFleet GitOps
  • Multi-cluster management out of the box
  • RKE2 hardened K8s distribution
  • UI-driven ops for the team

Fit · Multi-cluster fleets · UI-driven ops

Red Hat OpenShift

Vendor-supported K8s with extra batteries.

OpenShiftOperatorHubOpenShift VirtualizationOpenShift AI
  • Built-in registry, OAuth, RBAC, monitoring
  • Single support contract
  • Fits regulated / enterprise-Red-Hat shops

Fit · Red Hat-aligned shops · enterprise support

KubeVirt hybrid

VMs and containers on the same K8s cluster.

K8sKubeVirtGPU OperatorCDI
  • Host legacy VM tenants alongside container-native
  • One control plane, two workload types

Fit · Mixed workload portfolios · legacy VM tenants

What we deliver

Six surfaces of a production platform

Provisioning, automation, control plane, virtualisation, lifecycle, observability. Every surface delivered as code, signed off against acceptance criteria, handed over with runbooks your team can drive.

OS provisioning + boot

PXE / iPXE boot, hardware enrolment, day-zero image bake, vendor BMC integration. MaaS or Foreman by default. BCM or Dell Omnia where the customer's procurement leads there.

MaaSForemanBCMDell OmniaiPXE / BMC

Fleet automation

Configuration as code across every node. Ansible at the core, with a UI layer (AWX, Ansible Automation Platform, Rundeck) where the customer's ops team needs one. Every change reviewable in git.

AnsibleAWXAnsible Automation PlatformRundeckGitOps

Kubernetes control plane

Vanilla upstream via Kubespray, vendor-supported via Rancher or OpenShift, or a custom CNCF assembly. GPU Operator and Network Operator deployed against the customer's tenancy model.

KubesprayRancher / RKE2OpenShiftCustom CNCFGPU Operator

Virtualisation

KVM + libvirt when lightweight scripting is the right answer. Proxmox when the ops team wants a UI. OpenStack when the customer is running a full IaaS. KubeVirt when VMs and containers need to share a control plane.

KubeVirtKVMProxmoxOpenStacklibvirt

Patching, scheduling, lifecycle

OS patching against your agreed cadence (monthly / quarterly / continuous), scheduled maintenance windows, kernel and firmware updates, vendor security advisories triaged before they hit the on-call.

Patching SLAMaintenance windowsVendor advisoriesFirmware

Multi-tenancy, metering, observability

Workspace and RBAC model, network-policy isolation, GPU partitioning where the workload allows, per-tenant metering for chargeback, observability into your existing stack (Prometheus / Grafana / Loki, Datadog, or an in-house tool).

RBACNetwork policyMeteringPrometheusDatadog

What you receive

Eight named exit artefacts

Every engagement closes with concrete, version-controlled artefacts your team can act on the day after we leave. No deck. No “we will send the runbook next week”.

Where day-two is your team's, the as-code repo and the runbooks are the handover. Where day-two is ours, the same artefacts back the SLA.

  • Logical and physical platform design aligned to your form-factor choice
  • Provisioning toolchain as-code (MaaS / Foreman / BCM / Omnia configs under git)
  • Ansible playbook set covering install, day-2, and disaster-recovery paths
  • Kubernetes manifests + GitOps repo (when containers are in scope)
  • Multi-tenancy policy doc (workspaces, RBAC, network policy, quotas)
  • Patching SLA + maintenance-window calendar
  • Observability runbook (dashboards, alerts, paging integration)
  • Post-cutover acceptance test record signed off on the cutover call

Engagement shapes

Three ways we can work together

Yobitel-led when you need delivery speed. Collaborative when your team wants outside acceleration. Advisory when you want a second opinion before procurement.

Yobitel-led

We own the platform end-to-end

Full platform design, build, on-site validation, and optional day-2 managed operations handover. Best when your team is light on platform engineering or you want delivery on a fixed milestone.

Best fit · Light in-house platform capacity · production timeline pressure

Collaborative

We build with your team

Joint architecture reviews, paired implementation, focused workshops on the trickier surfaces (multi-tenant K8s, RBAC, patching automation, scheduler tuning). Your team executes the build; we sign off the design and join the cutover.

Best fit · Strong platform team · wants outside review + acceleration

Advisory

Time-boxed review

Fixed-window engagement to review a platform design you have already drafted. We spot risk, suggest a focused set of changes, deliver a written report.

Best fit · Design already complete · want a second opinion before procurement

From the field

Writeups from the platform practice

Short reads on the choices that decide whether an AI GPU platform holds up in production. Written by the engineers who design and operate these clusters.

Coming next

Choosing a Kubernetes flavour for an AI GPU cloud

Coming next

MaaS vs BCM vs Omnia: pick the provisioning toolchain

Form factors covered

Bare metal · VMs · Containers

Toolchains we deploy

MaaS · Foreman · BCM · Omnia · Ansible · Kubespray · Rancher · OpenShift · KubeVirt · KVM · Proxmox · OpenStack

Sovereignty perimeters

NCSC · GDPR · FedRAMP · MeitY · any framework

Tell us how your tenants will land.

The conversation takes about four minutes. Three short steps on the questionnaire (technical, strategic, functional), then your details. Our platform practice lead replies inside one working day with a fitted reference stack and a first-cut bill of materials.

Prefer email? Contact us

Yobitel is UK-headquartered with engagement teams that deliver into any sovereignty perimeter: NCSC / G-Cloud, EU GDPR, US FedRAMP-equivalent, India MeitY / DPDP, and beyond. No vendor lock-in built into the build.